Royal Philips International seems to be placing its bets on some innovative healthcare IT markets. Here are some that I’ve noticed in the past couple of years:

• VISICU (a remote ICU monitoring technology company acquired in 2007)
• Digital Pathology (commercial offering in 2009)
• Motiva (Remote patient management and education delivered through television)
• TeleStation (In-home hub for two-way communication between provider and patients with chronic diseases, integrated with wireless measurement devices)

The list above is not comprehensive by any means, it’s just what I could recall right away. Without making this a post about Philips’ strategy, here is the latest addition to my personal list of innovative Philips Healthcare IT offerings- DirectLife activity monitor. It tracks your physical activity (through a triple axis accelerometer) to calculate calories burned. Results show up on a personal webpage (detailed) and on the device (simple indicator lights).

It’s like FitBit, but with some design differences – DirectLife is waterproof and needs USB-based sync (FitBit is wireless through a hub). Most importantly, DirectLife comes with a coach- a real person to provide inspiration and assistance to meet your target weight or activity level. The device (hardware) is $99, but coaching is a monthly subscription of $12.95 (first four months free).

The entry of Philips in this lifestyle-tracking arena makes the proposition more legit for mass adoption- now the HR departments of large enterprises  can think of offering it as a health benefit, maybe health insurance companies will pay attention too. FitBit is a great device in itself, but what’s needed is a “wellness service”, much like what DirectLife is starting to sound like. My prediction is that we’ll see proliferation of such services in the next few years- maybe even a lower premium option in your medical insurance if you choose an integrated activity tracking service.

Here is a half-baked idea that adds another data point to my rant about how keeping a record of health-related activities is useful, and how web 2.0 technologies can help enable such a record. Bedpost is a web application (currently in private beta) that helps in keeping track of user’s sex life. I’ve not used the site myself, but they claim simple functionality- log in after the fact and fill in some fields about it. Thankfully, they also claim ‘zero social networking’ functionality to keep things private.

Sure all this can be a simple iPhone app (maybe there is already one out there) or even a one-line cryptic entry in your google calendar. My point is not to critique the utility of an independent website to track one’s sex life. I’m reflecting on the overall trend of niche health and wellness ‘trackers’ (read my previous posts about FitBit, Proactive Sleep, ZeaLog, Qwitter). Given the myriad sexual disorders (e.g. Erectile Dysfunction) and their probable causes, an application like this could provide rich history for clinicians. Overall, it underscores the importance of web 2.0 technologies in enabling consumers to keep granular, accurate health records.

In their own words ‘Psych Central is the Internet’s largest and oldest independent mental health social network’. From what I can find, it seems to be true. They have been online since 1995, and last year got close to half a million unique visitors.

So consider it as the social network that started before the age of social networking. It now offers blogs, forums, reviews, news, feeds, tweets and other community features to people interested in mental health. Seems like they are making a decent revenue with it too.

Always good to see focused, pragmatic and simple solutions being successful. Proves the point that social networking has more potential when done in a niche way.

Usually I’m wary of putting time into big-budget health portals, but San Francisco based Healthline deserves a mention. They have a portfolio of healthcare search, navigation and content that is syndicated through a growing network of big web properties like AARP, Health.com, iVillage, AOL etc.

Healthline was founded in 1999 as YourDoctor.com and was re-launched as Healthline Networks in 2005. It’s got some deep-pocket investors behind it (Aetna, NBCU, Kaiser Permanente, Reed Elsevier, US News & World Report to name a few) so I’m not surprised that they have managed to create (what they call as) ‘Consumer Healthcare Taxonomy’ of >1 million terms and 250K medical concepts. That is what powers their proprietary ability to organize and present contextually-relevant health information to a viewer. Personally I dont think much of it, given that there are plenty of precursors in the medical ontology area (SNOMED, UMLS…) that match this feat.

So Healthline can power health search in multiple ways (symptom, treatment, doctor, drug) and help consumers navigate to the right information. They have also branched out into health-specific ad network, PHR etc. Regardless, I’m interested in mentioning Healthline because of their excellent 3D Body Maps. They have a neat library of 3D animations that lets you partially control and understand body structure and function. Much like CareFlash. Development of these consumer-oriented educational health content repositories is a positive trend, although it’d be much nicer if all these individual attempts were cataloged in one place, giving a complete guide to educational 3D health and wellness content on the web. Like what Clicker does for Internet television.

CareFlash has an interesting take on social networking for patients. It lets you create a private, secure website to inform and update your family/friends about your medical condition- an online ‘community’ of sorts. Good concept. Having an invite-only, private community helps everyone to stay current with latest developments about the health of someone they love, without everyone calling and visiting all the time. They have some neat features like a shared calendar, email alerts, forums etc.

The crown jewel offering is the educational content- they have 3D medical animations around a long list of conditions. These are meant to help patients and relatives better understand the medical condition. The content is developed by another company (Blausen Medical) and is high-quality, professional grade. I reviewed some of the videos and found them quite useful.

Its been around since 2007 and gets substantial visitors- around 2K+ per month. The site is completely free, and one of the press releases points to their business model “CareFlash is completely free to our users because select industries value having their advertisements tastefully and unobtrusively displayed in the circumstances on which each unique community is based.” Although I didn’t see any ads next to the videos I saw.

PharmaSurveyor is a free service that analyzes your medications to point out potential drug interaction and side-effect risks. It was founded in 2006 by Linda and Erick Von Schweber to commercialize the ‘knowledge surveying’ technology they have developed over the last 25 years or so.

Given the fact that Adverse Drug Effects (ADE) are one of the leading cause of death in the US, there is significant market opportunity in consumer education and support around it. Couple of nifty features that I like:

• Direct meds import from Healthvault
• Community Knowledge Base – an aggregation of information and experiences from people who are on multiple drugs. This feature is currently in private beta, but I think that it can be a great revenue opportunity once it gets some traction in terms of number of users. There are plenty of pharma companies who would pay good money for getting early (even though informal) insight into side-effects, efficacy, interactions, and usage patterns of their drugs.

Seems like they are planning to integrate with DestinationRx and Polka, which is a good idea since the traffic from those sites will already be primed for the services that PharmaSurveyor provides. The advisory board has some significant names, including Barney Pell, Matthew Holt and Mark Musen.

They do have some interesting marketing techniques like analyzing celebrity cocktails, not requiring registrations, etc. Business model seems to be only google ads for now, which is no surprise given their research-oriented background. The site is more a proof-of-concept for the underlying technology (although I’m not sure what it is exactly). It’ll make a lot of sense to integrate this service with commercial CIS offerings, and take it one step beyond just using RxNorm.

As I mentioned previously, the hype of personalized medicine is breeding a new industry-direct to consumer (DTC) Genetic Testing. These companies offer to test, analyze and store your genetic information for you. Navigenics entered this arena in April’08, with some stellar credentials in terms of team, funding (KPCB, Sequoia among others) and collaborations (Mayo, Partners, Duke, Scripps, MedScape, etc.).

Here is a simple overview of their offering: pay $500 to be tested for 10 common conditions or upgrade to $2,500 for all conditions (28 currently). The upgraded package has perks of genetic counseling, personalized updates and educational content for a year.  Beyond  that you pay $250/year to keep it going. What sets Navigenics apart (as I understand) is that they only tell you your results from the perspective of these 28 (and growing) conditions whereas others (deCODEme, 23andMe) let you ‘explore’ your results for every trait/condition they are continuously covering.

Regardless of what company it is, the question remains that how much can you learn from you genetic profile? If you are at 64% risk for Diabetes type 2 and 47% risk for macular degeneration, what can you do about it?  Well, the advice would mostly include one or more of- exercise,  dont smoke, eat healthy, avoid alcohol, sleep well, vitamins, lookout for warning signs etc. So why get the test; you should be doing all that anyways. I’m not knocking down genetic testing per se, just trying to find utility for it in a DTC model.

The future of healtcare is more personalized, for sure. I’m happy that the commercial foundation for it is being laid down right now. But personally, I wouldnt invest in these services till we firmly and clearly establish an end-to-end causal linkage between genes, diasease, and therapy. We havent even agreed on how important is the role of enviornment and habits (is it only genes that determine a disease outcome?) Heck, who said it’s genes- what about proteomics?

Consumerism is on the rise in healthcare, and MyMedLab brings that trend to the Lab testing space. With their service users can self-order wellness lab exams online and walk-in to the lab nearest to their zip code. Note that this doesn’t include all possible lab tests, but only the subset that don’t require direct physician order.

The price they charge includes collection fee for sample draw, ordering physician fee (i.e. lab order approval, result review, consultation) and a Personal Health Record (where you can view and store the results, among other things). Users pay upfront for the tests and have the option to receive a receipt to submit for reimbursement from an insurance company or a health savings account.

There are several other players in this direct-to-consumer lab testing, like DirectLabs, HealthCheckUSA, MedLabUSA. The benefits of these services are tangible- lower cost (specially for the uninsured, who don’t want to pay for the visit to the doctor), convenience, speed and privacy.

But not everything is that straight-forward. Most insurance companies will not reimburse patients for tests that were not ordered by a physician, so the target market is restricted to people who are health-conscious and rich enough to pay for self-initiated disease monitoring. Jury is still out on many aspects- who approves these tests medically? Who carries the legal burden? Is it okay to let patients self-diagnose themselves? what about misinterpretation of results? IMHO, there is a market and advantage for direct-to-consumer lab testing, even if the healthcare system doesnt recognize or reimburse for it yet. Also, these services would look pretty good as applications on PHR platforms like Google Health.